Make one person accountable for turning AI into measurable operating improvements.
Fractional AI leadership and implementation without a full-time hire.
Sidekick works with your executive sponsor and workflow owners to choose the right problems, coordinate stakeholders and systems, put changes into real use, and measure whether the operation is better off.
Every workstream begins with a baseline and ends with a decision: scale, improve, hand off, hold, or stop.
Sidekick has prepared the context, recommendation, and next move for each one.
From scattered AI activity to an operating system someone owns.
Sidekick closes the gap between what may be happening across the business today and the controlled, measurable operating state leadership needs.
Tool use spreads without shared rules
People may use AI tools without clear guidance on client information, company data, acceptable use, or human review.
Approved tools and clear data boundaries
The team uses an approved set of tools, follows clear rules for information, and knows when to request permission or human review.
Experiments compete for attention
Teams try isolated tools and automations, but the work is not ranked against business priorities or the effort needed to support it.
A portfolio tied to business priorities
Leadership ranks each workflow against a defined outcome, owner, baseline, operating cost, and decision to scale, improve, hold, or stop.
Nobody can see the whole system
Leadership lacks one view of the tools in use, the workflows they touch, who owns them, and where controls or decisions are missing.
One operating view
Tools, workflows, owners, data boundaries, controls, adoption, and open decisions are visible in one managed portfolio.
Strategy exists, but ownership is unclear
Leadership sees the opportunity, but no one is accountable for coordinating stakeholders, implementation, adoption, and measurement.
One operator accountable to the outcome
Sidekick coordinates the change and reports against the agreed business measure. Your executive sponsor keeps decision authority.
One owner from opportunity to operating result.
Choose a priority workflow, record how it works today, and agree on the measure and review boundary before changing it.
Align the executive sponsor, workflow owners, IT, data access, implementation partners, and decision rights needed to make the change real.
Configure the workflow, instructions, context, permissions, controls, and human review points needed for real use.
Work with the people who will use and own the workflow until they can operate it without Sidekick carrying the knowledge.
Review use, quality, exceptions, operating impact, and support demand. Then scale, improve, hand off, hold, or stop based on evidence.
Start with evidence. Build for real use. Transfer what works.
Name the workflow, sponsor, owner, current process, baseline, target range, review boundary, and the conditions to scale or stop.
Build the smallest useful change, coordinate access and stakeholders, test it on real work, and correct what fails.
Support the workflow owners, measure use and operating impact, then scale, improve, hand off, hold, or stop.
The client keeps the workflow, context, controls, runbook, decision history, and operating ownership.
Where this takes you.
Task-based AI
Using AI to draft, research, and answer questions. The business still runs on people.
Where most startTool adoption
AI tools across apps. Some automation. Individual tasks move faster, but operations are unchanged.
Common todayAI operations
Workflows that run without manual initiation. Infrastructure your team owns, operates, and builds on.
Where we take youCustom AI infrastructure
Purpose-built agent systems on cloud primitives (Bedrock, Vertex, Agent Core). Dedicated engineering team required. Scoped by Chase, specialist-built.
Outside this scopeEvery workstream starts with a measure and ends with a decision.
The before state
The current workflow, its exceptions, and the baseline measure, recorded before anything changes.
Who used it, and how often
Eligible cases versus actual use, by the people who own the workflow, not a demo account.
What passed, failed, or needed correction
First-pass acceptance, corrections, exceptions, and escalations, counted honestly.
What changed in the operating measure
The bounded before-and-after comparison on the measure the workflow was built to move.
What it cost to run and support
Delivery, review, support demand, and total cost, so the result is judged against what it took.
What the evidence supports next
Scale, remediation, handoff, hold, or stop. Every workstream ends with a decision, not a slide.
Each engagement defines the outcome, baseline, comparison window, target range, and the conditions to scale, hold, or stop.
Start at the scale the work can support.
A bounded start for a clear operating problem.
Establish the current process, target, controls, and stop or scale decision before expanding.
Use this route when the problem, sponsor, and evidence can be clearly named.
See what the start establishes
- →Current process and accountable sponsor
- →Baseline, target, and review boundary
- →Smallest useful workflow change
- →Real-use review and correction
- →Stop, improve, hand off, or scale decision
One accountable owner for the AI operating portfolio.
Coordinate the roadmap, workflows, controls, adoption, measurement, and delivery partners across the operation.
Use this route when several workflows, teams, systems, or implementation partners need ongoing ownership.
See the ownership scope
- →Roadmap and workflow portfolio
- →Controls, adoption, and review
- →Measurement and decision records
- →Implementation-partner coordination
- →Capability and ownership transfer
Sidekick takes a small number of engagements at a time. Timing and capacity are confirmed during qualification.
The Fractional starting price is shown in CAD. Final scope and any separately required specialist work are confirmed after qualification.
Chase founded Sidekick after more than a decade in B2B partnerships and revenue operations at SaaS, marketplace, and healthcare-data companies. Jobber. DoorDash. DrugBank.
The thesis is straightforward. Most owner-operated and mid-market firms cannot justify a full-time Head of AI yet. The fractional model is the bridge. Built right, it sunsets once the team is running the system without him.
Based in Metro Vancouver, BC. Selectively taking new engagements.
Know what you are buying.
An embedded operator owns the AI adoption portfolio, selects the workflows worth changing, coordinates the build, and transfers the operating capability to your team.
What this is
- ✓An operator accountable for the outcome, not a block of weekly hours
- ✓Workflows configured around how your business actually runs
- ✓A scoped first workflow brought into live use with review and adoption tracked
- ✓Your team trained to operate the system
What this is not
- ×A custom multi-agent build with bespoke MCP servers or API plumbing
- ×A weekly strategy call without execution
- ×A retainer for unbounded advisory hours
- ×A permanent fractional executive seat
- noEvery engagement needs a workflow owner on your team. If that role is missing, start smaller or hire first.
- noCustomer-facing agents that touch PII require a dedicated security review before scope. We will say no until that exists.
- noIf operating use does not materialize, the engagement pauses for a re-scope rather than rolling forward by default.
What buyers ask before signing.
Can we keep using the workflows after the engagement ends?
What happens if we want to leave mid-engagement?
What tools do we have to switch to?
Is Chase the operator on every engagement?
What data leaves our tenants?
Looking for a personal AI workspace instead? Sidekick Solo is built for individual professionals. →
